New Approach for Examination of Pattern Evidences: Cases study

Improvement in technology has changed the techniques and pattern of examination of the physical evidences. The technology based gazettes like PDA, Computer and digital camera has improved the process of examination and speed of file-work while examination. Two different types of case exhibits and their pattern of examination in physics point-of-view, how the technology changes the hierarchy of old pattern.


New Approach for Examination of Pattern Evidences: Cases study
Sharma M *1 and Jha S 2 1 In-Charge, Mobile Forensic Science Unit, Bharatpur, Senior Scientific Officer (Physics Division), Regional FSL, Bharatpur (Raj.), India 2 Dy. Director (Physics Division), State FSL, Jaipur, India During the last decade, inexpensive yet powerful digital computers and tools have become widely available and have been applied to a multitude of tasks. By hitching computers with imaging detectors and displays, very capable systems for creating and analyzing imagery have been constructed and are being applied in many arenas.

ISSN: 2348-9804
From the cases study, importance of new technology is exemplified, using the latest technique, computer based software to examine the exhibit. Importance in cases related to footwear impression, tyre-tread mark and tool marks analysis are reported.
For example, they now are used to reconstruct x-ray and magnetic resonance images in medicine, to analyze multi-spectral aerial and satellite images for environmental and military uses, to read Universal Product Codes that specify products and prices in retail stores, just to name a few [1][2][3]. A forensic evidence analyst may be defined as a forensic scientist concerned with the characterization, identification, and comparison of microscopic materials in criminal cases. Trace evidence helps solve crimes by linking people, places, and things involved in a crime. By the microscopic materials they share through and proper analysis methodology gives the way to justice.
Through this paper authors have investigated the basic principles and introductory applications of digital imaging systems, and include many simple examples to illustrate the concepts using some software like Canvas, Photoshop and Corel Draw and how these tools can be used in the Forensic examinations at spot as well as in the lab [4-6].

Materials and Methods
The examination of physical evidence by a forensic scientist is generally undertaken for the purposes of identification or comparison [7].
Comparison: The process of ascertaining whether two or more objects have a common origin. A comparison analysis subjects a suspect specimen and a standard/reference specimen to the same tests and examinations for the ultimate purpose of determining whether they have a common origin.
Compare in cases related to: 1) Hair found at a scene to hair from a suspect 2) A paint chip found at a scene with the paint from a suspect vehicle 3) Fibers found on a victim with fibers found in suspect's back seat.
Forensic Comparison is a two-step procedure To comprehend the evidential value of a comparison, one must appreciate the role that probability has in ascertaining the origins of two or more specimens [8][9][10]. Proposed cases studies in this article are purely new and specific, we suggest reader to study as basic methodologies and techniques readily available in literature [11][12][13].
The subject of shoe prints examinations are images of soles left by the perpetrator on surfaces such as floor, carpet, soil, pavement and street. In Table 1 summary of the two shoes print comparison with the help of Corel Draw Software and Canvas 9 software. From Table 1, one can easily conclude that the shoe print belongs to the same shoe. The accuracy level of distances measured my human is two point where using software's the accuracy upgraded as four point after decimal is being achieved. In this case study, one person was died at the spot and the accidented motorcycle was hide, by the perosn from whom the motorcycle was collide. The tyre treat impression on the gravel sand road, was not sufficient clear, but on behalf of the digital camera, we are able to trace the direction of motorcyle was hidden, by the road side. The impression was compared with the corel draw X3 software. One can easily conclude that the direction of vehicles before/after accidnet on the basis of the direction of the tyre tread impressions on the spot of occurrence Figure 1(a-f).
Many researchers have recently been examining how automated computer systems could help police search and match shoeprint in order to link suspects to crime scenes. Bodziak is one of the leading authorities in the area of manual human shoeprint classification [9]. He described the process of detection, recovery and examination of footwear impression evidence.
Tool marks or marks of objects that have been used as tools are often found on stolen vehicles/houses entry point. Among the tools that leave identifiable marks are axes, knives, screwdrivers, chisels, crowbars, pliers, and cutters. In general, the tool marks are a result of the action of entering and/or starting the point of the area. The best places to find these tool marks are on or around the different locks present on the houses/vehicle (doors, trunk, or ignition). To collect these marks, it is best to take the entire lock back to the laboratory. This allows the tool mark examiner to have sufficient time to study the object and to make the most appropriate comparisons with any suspected tools. Casting or other methods of taking impressions of a tool mark should be used when it is not possible to collect the object onto which the marks are present. In this study we have proposed the proper digital photographic analysis for tool marks.

Tool marks Analysis:
Tool marks request is for the examination of a tool and a surface suspected of having been contacted by the tool to determine the presence of unique microscopic characteristics on the surface imparted to it by the tool. The use cause tools to bear unique microscopic characteristics. Under certain conditions these characteristics can be imparted to surfaces contacted by tools. Submitted tools should be able to produce the mark in question and have a suspect associated with them. However, the evidence mark be submitted whenever possible. The examination of tool marks is very important at the scene of occurrence and in the laboratory too.  The performed shoeprint, tyre-tread impression and tool marks showed that there is a possibility of per forming comparative analyses even on such difficult material as on different surfaces using software like CorelDraw and Canvas. For forensic scientists, it is often interesting to establish whether the investigated shoeprint has already been photographed. The results of this study could therefore be exploited in the future to test the ability of the method to find the same or similar techniques in the images database and the evaluation would in this case be done using different photographs of SOC to test the retrieval in the database.